Anita Hill: No Apology to Clarence Thomas

View Comments
Grow your business smarter.

Visit CBS Detroit's

Small Business Center.

hill anita1991ap Anita Hill: No Apology to Clarence Thomas

In this 1991 file photo, Anita Hill testifies before the Senate. (AP Photo)

Anita Hill is refusing to apologize for accusing then-Supreme Court justice nominee Clarence Thomas of sexually harassing her, in an issue that Thomas’ wife has reopened 19 years after his confirmation hearings.

“I have no intention of apologizing because I testified truthfully about my experience and I stand by that testimony,” Hill, now a Brandeis University professor, said in a statement released Tuesday night.

Thomas’ wife, Virginia, had left a voicemail message on Hill’s phone over the weekend asking her to say she was sorry for the allegations that surfaced at Thomas’ confirmation hearings for a seat on the high court bench in 1991.

In her statement, Hill said, “I certainly thought the call was inappropriate.” She had worked for Clarence Thomas in two federal government jobs prior to the time he was selected for the court by President George H.W. Bush for the Supreme Court.

Virginia Thomas said in a statement that she was “extending an olive branch” to Hill.

In a transcript of the message, Thomas identified herself and then said, “I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day,” Thomas said.

CBS News confirmed the contents of the voicemail left by Thomas.

When Hill heard the voicemail, she contacted Brandeis’ public safety office, which in turn informed the FBI.

In her statement, Virginia Thomas said she did not intend to offend Hill.

“I did place a call to Ms. Hill at her office extending an olive branch to her after all these years, in hopes that we could ultimately get passed (sic) what happened so long ago. That offer still stands, I would be very happy to meet and talk with her if she would be willing to do the same,” Thomas said.

Reached Tuesday night, Thomas told CBS News Chief Legal Correspondent Jan Crawford her views on an apology from Hill haven’t changed since she said in a 2007 interview that Hill should apologize to her and Justice Thomas.

In that interview, which aired on ABC, Ginni Thomas strongly defended her husband and flatly rejected Hill’s allegations. With Justice Thomas sitting beside her in their Virginia home, Ginni Thomas also said that she looked forward to getting Hill’s apology someday.

“My views I expressed to you have not changed since your interview of me,” Thomas said in an e-mail Tuesday.

FBI Special Agent Jason Pack, a spokesman at bureau headquarters in Washington, declined to comment on the voicemail.

During his Senate confirmation hearings, Clarence Thomas adamantly denied Hill’s accusations that he made inappropriate sexual remarks, including references to pornographic movies. Thomas said he did talk about X-rated movies while at Yale Law School, adding that so did many other young people in the 1970s.

The allegations nearly derailed his nomination.

Thomas called the nationally televised hearings a “high-tech lynching.”

He broke a 16-year silence about the hearings in a 2007 book, “My Grandfather’s Son,” writing that Hill was a mediocre employee who was used by political opponents to make claims she had been sexually harassed. The justice’s wife first suggested Hill apologize in interviews the couple gave after the release of the book.

Hill had worked for Thomas at the Education Department and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. She first made her allegations after Thomas had been nominated to the high court, 10 years after she began working for him and only after she was contacted by congressional investigators.

Thomas has drawn more attention this year for starting a lobbying group which promotes activism and conservative principals, as legal experts have warned Clarence Thomas should be wary of any conflicts of interest that arise related to his legal decisions.

© MMX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,974 other followers