tsa screeningap Government Leaders Can Skip Security, TSA Says

(AP Photo/Peter M. Fredin)

While the rest of the country enters a “Constitutional Twilight Zone” every time they step into an airport, many top politicians and government officials have their rights to privacy fully protected when they fly, reports the Associated Press.

Cabinet secretaries, top congressional leaders and an exclusive group of senior U.S. officials are exempt from toughened new airport screening procedures when they fly commercially with government-approved federal security details.

Aviation security officials would not name those who can skip the controversial screening, but other officials said those VIPs range from top officials like Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and FBI Director Robert Mueller to congressional leaders like incoming House Speaker John Boehner, who avoided security before a recent flight from Washington’s Reagan National Airport.

In a way, by exempting government officials and politicians, it is a kind of reverse of the profiling some politicians have begun to promote.

The new, tough security procedures, which involve either an invasive body scan or an enhanced pat-down, have caused some uproar in the American public and the media. While a majority of Americans support them, the support for the procedures may be slipping.

While passengers have no choice but to submit to either the detector or what some complain is an intrusive pat-down, senior government officials can opt out if they fly accompanied by government security guards approved by the TSA.

“Government officials traveling with approved federal law enforcement security details are not required to undergo security screening,” TSA spokesman Nicholas Kimball said, speaking about checkpoint security at airports. “TSA follows a specialized screening protocol for federal law enforcement officers and those under their control, which includes identity verification.”

The TSA would not explain why it makes these exceptions. But many of the exempted government officials have gone through several levels of security clearances, including FBI background checks, and travel with armed law enforcement, eliminating the need for an additional layer of security at airports.

Armed law enforcement officials who travel commercially are also allowed to skip airport security after they fill out the proper paperwork at the airport.

Some members of President Barack Obama’s Cabinet, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, travel almost exclusively on government or military planes and are therefore not subject to airport security.

Geithner travels with a Secret Service detail, for example, the only Treasury official with such a security exception. When Mueller and John Morton, head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, travel on commercial airlines with their federal security details, they also skip the lines, machines and pat-downs.

Same goes for Boehner, the top House Republican, who was sighted last week being guided past security lines at Reagan. Spokesmen for both Boehner and current House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would not discuss security arrangements. But under a policy started by the Bush administration after the Sept. 11 attacks, a military aircraft is made available to the speaker, third in line to the presidency, for all official flight needs.

Senate Sergeant at Arms Terrance Gainer said the only Congress members with protective details are leaders, “based upon a threat analysis conducted by the (U.S. Capitol Police) and affirmed by the Capitol Police Board.” Gainer added that members “with sworn protection” are able to avoid security because “their secure posture is affirmed by the law enforcement process established by TSA.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid flies commercial, has a security detail and does not go through security, spokesman Jim Manley said. The assistant Senate Democratic leader, Richard Durbin of Illinois, flies commercial and has a security detail; mainly when he’s in Washington. His office said he goes through the security line like other passengers.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell flies commercial, spokesman Donald Stewart said, who also would not detail his security arrangements.

A spokesman for incoming House Majority Leader Eric Cantor declined to discuss his arrangements. Daniel Reilly, a spokesman for outgoing House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland, said he flies commercial, but also would not discuss security.

A few lawmakers have called for investigations into the intimate pat-downs, and some refuse to go through the full-body imaging machines when they travel. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, who has blasted the procedures, avoids the scanners but goes through security and takes the pat-down if it’s required, according to his spokeswoman Alisia Essig.

The TSA’s administrator, John Pistole, is treated like any other traveler when he flies, waiting in security lines and walking through X-ray machines, including the full-body imagers, his spokesman said.

Even as he has led a publicity campaign in recent days to urge cooperation from air travelers, Pistole’s agency is preparing for long lines at airports Wednesday, the busiest travel day of the year.

Despite tough talk on the Internet, there was little if any indication of a passenger revolt at many major U.S. airports, with very few people declining the X-ray scan that can peer through their clothes. Those who refuse the machines are subject to a pat-down search that includes the crotch and chest.

This year’s pat-downs are different from last year. The new version includes a rigorous screening that involves agents running their hands inside a passenger’s legs and along the cheek of the buttocks as well as direct contact with the groin area.

The American Civil Liberties Union has received more than 600 complaints over three weeks from passengers who say they were subjected to humiliating pat-downs at U.S. airports, and the pace is accelerating, according to ACLU legislative counsel Christopher Calabrese.

© MMX, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

  1. bill says:

    typical of most to all govt rules. the rule exempt the ruling class of govt employees. try ADA, employment practices, not paying taxes and getting away with it, etc. this is par for the course. we need that amendment that is floating around that no law can be passed that does not affect elected officials as it affects all others.

  2. Jerry says:

    Just another situation where government officials (the employee) put themselves ahead of the people (the employer) Arrogance run amuck.

  3. Sally Hart says:

    NO ONE should be exempt. Anyone who is exempt and uses this status to opt out is putting themselves above the law of the land. This includes the President and any Secret Service Agents who fly with him. We never know when someone will be bribed, blackmailed, etc to carry on or conceal inappropriate explosive material. And it may be something as simple as please take this cell phone and deliver it to so and so after you get off. I will repeat NO ONE should be exempt. Even pilots and other members of the flight crew. In fact any employee (ground crew, ticket agent, etc) who has access to luggage should be screened every day they work and when they return from breaks, using the restroom, any time away from their duty station.

  4. CeCe says:

    Even if government officials have security clearance, they should still be required to go through screening. They need to understand the frustrations and inconveniences their constituents go through. Notice no one really seemed to care about these changes until a well-to-do guy was put through enhanced screening.

  5. Scotty Boman says:

    This violates the equal protection clause. Polititians are not nobility, they are servants.

  6. Gobsmacked says:

    Unbelievable! How can anyone think that this is fair? The schleps have no choice but to be denied boarding if they refuse these invasive searches whose impact on risk reduction is debatable but continue to erode the freedom on which we as Americans pride ourselves. People appointed by people that we’ve elected get a free pass? ARGH! I can only imagine that Al Qaeda leaders are laughing their a***s off. When do we stop letting them set our priorities and our agenda by responding retrospectively to tactics that didn’t work?

  7. Charlotte says:

    The government leaders aren’t any better than the common person! They should be made to go through security also. If they would practice what they preached this country would be in a much better place. The first place to start would be for all higher government officials to take a 10 percent pay cut, then we wouldn’t have any deficit!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE