LANSING (WWJ) – Debate over Governor Rick Snyder’s controversial budget continues in Lansing, on the eve of an expected full vote on the plan in the state Senate.

The first speaker to testify, Wednesday, was business owner, Charlie Owens, who supports Gov. Snyder’s plan to kill the Michigan Business Tax.

“The bottom line, for our members and for small business in the state, is that the Michigan Business Tax was no improvement over the Single Business Tax it replaced, and for most businesses it is worse.  You know you’re in trouble when you have businesses pining to bring back the Single Business Tax,” Owens said.

Owens said the Michigan Business Tax imposes a double tax on many small businesses.

Also speaking Wednesday was Nancy Marr, president of Prime Housing Group, who told lawmakers how the Michigan Business Tax has affected her business.

“Our SBT burden was about $20,000 in 2006. In 2008, when it went to the MBT, it went up to $60,000. In 2009, it was $48,000. We ended up laying off an employee and we aren’t in a position to hire somebody back for that position, because at $40,000 to $60,000-a-year, that’s an employee,” Marr said.

Marr said her parents, who started the business, would prefer to pay a tax on pensions.

Even though the package has apparently stalled in a Senate committee, WWJ Lansing Bureau Chief Tim Skubick said Governor Snyder can get around that roadblock in time for a vote Thursday.

“The Governor probably doesn’t have the votes on this Senate committee to pass it to the floor. But he doesn’t need them, because they could discharge the committee on the Senate floor to set up the showdown for tomorrow,” he said.

Skubick said Senate Republican leader Randy Richardville of Monroe maintains that he has the votes necessary to pass the Governor’s business tax, which also includes that controversial pension tax on retirees under the age of 67.

Comments (2)
  1. Carl Binion says:

    SO, now Governor Snyder and the business owners, who are more lucrative than the average working man, want to tax the aged and the older people who are on fixed incomes.
    A business person can increase his/her business and make more money, but a person who is 62 and up on a fixed income cannot do so.
    I wrote Governor Snyder an email to TAX CHURCHES.
    I also, unlike most Republicans, gave him the reason and advantages of taxing churches instead of taxing seniors on fixed incomes.

  2. Jim says:

    You know, when you think about it, most working people are on a “fixed income” if they are on salary and/or work a stable number of hours per week. Fixed income is a relative term. Businesses hire people; fixed incomers don’t! Of course tax churches; however, if you don’t go to church, it doesn’t affect you. Another “tax the other guy”, not me.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE