ANN ARBOR (WWJ) – In a letter to President Obama, University of Michigan President Mary Sue Coleman said a recent meeting with college presidents is the best Christmas present she could have hoped for because it moved a “thorny issue” to a national stage.

Coleman said the cost of attending college is one of the most serious matters facing a country that seeks to strengthen its global competitiveness.

Talking with WWJ Newsradio 950’s Greg Bowman, Coleman said it’s imperative we find a way to make higher education more affordable for families.

“What that does is to bring an intelictual well being to the society. It advances health and medicine — we all care about that — business, social sciences, the arts … that’s what higher education does and what it offers,” said Coleman.

“And yet, over the last decade — at least, all the time I’ve been at Michigan — every year we’ve gotten a budget cut. There’s a big disinvestment in higher education,” she said.

Hear Greg Bowman’s interview with Mary Sue Coleman:

While Coleman said no other nation can rival the innovation, creativity and intellectual fervor of our universities, she says there must be a way to provide a college education at a reasonable cost.  She said U-M and the state’s other 14 public institutions  have already been forced raise tuition and to make big budget cuts.

Among Coleman’s suggestions include states reinvesting in public universities, universities going to alumni and friends for scholarships and colleges cutting costs.

Read the full letter below:

Dear Mr. President,

Your recent meeting with college presidents is the best Christmas present I could have hoped for.

By bringing together higher education leaders to discuss college affordability, you have elevated a thorny issue that demands a national conversation because of its impact on all sectors of society.  The cost of attending college is one of the most serious matters facing a country that seeks to strengthen its global competitiveness.  How we resolve this dilemma requires collaboration, sacrifice and hard choices.

American higher education – particularly public higher education – is one of the monumental achievements of our country.  No other nation can rival the innovation, creativity and intellectual fervor of our universities.  Our institutions are responsible for America’s knowledge security – an intellectual wellbeing that advances health and medicine, business, social science, the arts, public policy and national defense.

And yet college is costly – too costly for some families.  To meet the myriad needs of students and society, we absolutely must find ways to provide a college education at a cost that is sustainable.  President Thomas Jefferson was rightfully adamant that a cornerstone of democracy is education for all, “from the richest to the poorest.”

Higher education is a public good currently lacking public support.  There is no stronger trigger for rising costs at public universities and colleges than declining state support.  The University of Michigan and our state’s 14 other public institutions have been ground zero for funding cuts. The state’s significant disinvestment in higher education has been challenging: a 15 percent cut in the last year alone, and a reduction of more than 30 percent over the last decade.

We have worked extremely hard to mitigate the impact of these cuts on students and families.  We must and will do more, but also offer recommendations that may benefit all of higher education.

First and foremost, it is essential that states reinvest in their public colleges and universities.  Not doing so is shortsighted and threatens to cripple remarkable institutions of learning.  The University of California system is admired worldwide, yet its rapid dismantling because of underfunding is distressing; this is just the most dramatic example of starved higher education budgets nationwide.

Second, American business, to remain globally competitive, has a vested interest in the talent and research embodied in higher education.  As employers of our graduates, business leaders must advocate for strong, consistent funding of higher education.  The Business Leaders of Michigan, for example, is a private organization partnering with our state’s three research universities to help reignite the Michigan economy.  These executives advocate increasing our state investment in higher education from its current status of 38th in the nation to the top 10.  This collective voice of support is encouraging and powerful.

Third, private support no longer is a luxury, but rather a necessity.  Philanthropy has always been a cornerstone of America’s private universities; the culture of giving back to one’s alma mater is ingrained in students from their first days on campus.  Public universities must look more to alumni and friends for support, particularly for scholarships.  As president, I challenged Michigan alumni to fund need-based scholarships for undergraduates, and they responded with nearly $70 million; this came after raising $540 million in a capital campaign to support students.  Universities have an obligation to ask, and alumni should feel equally obligated to give back.

Finally, universities themselves must continue to cut costs.  It may not always feel so for families, but at Michigan we have cut $235 million in operational costs in the last eight years to help offset tuition increases.  We have eliminated or consolidated hundreds of jobs.  We have asked employees to pay more for their health care.  Only one budget item is sacrosanct and that is financial aid; here we are adding dollars.  The result is that for many of our low- to middle-income resident students, it actually costs less to attend Michigan today than in 2004, and their loan burdens are lower than in previous years.  

Mr. President, you have two wonderful daughters; I have two beautiful grandchildren.  Parents and grandparents throughout the country want a secure, productive future for our young, and that future will demand a college education.  As a former college professor, you know the rewards of seeing students grow intellectually, exercise critical thinking, and begin to shape their communities.  This transformative experience of higher learning contributes to the overall wellbeing of our nation.

The onus is now on all of us – elected officials, university presidents, business leaders, philanthropists and parents – to collaborate on effective answers.  I welcome being part of this critical national conversation and I trust that together America can find solutions.

You have my best wishes for a warm holiday season.

Respectfully yours

Mary Sue Coleman

Comments (2)
  1. able cynic says:

    Well, to start, the University of Michigan should cut the administration staff at all the branches back to the same ratio that it was in 1970. That will save billions. Second, it should eliminate all liberal arts undergraduate degrees that were not available in 1970 and increase the number of students to all technical and scientific majors — you know, the ones that lead to jobs and productivity. Second, stop all affirmative action admissions for those with substandard SAT Scores. Let them transfer after two years at a community college, even if they start as freshman. That would eliminate the enormous burden of the “freshman year failure rate” problem. And last, perhaps some of the branch campus locations that no longer serve any purpose other than as “community feel-good” locations should be closed.

  2. Pravina says:

    I agree with “able cynic”. All the University Presidents better look within their universities to find out where they are wasting money and how the funding is misused. What president Obama needs is a workforce that goes within the universities and find out where and how money is misused. Financial Aid in the form of a debt is not an aid but a burden to the student.

    Even if I would afford to pay for the college education for my kids, I would not send my kids for college education since it would be foolish to pay such high tuition cost. Education is not something that only universities can give. You can get educated for free through online resources. Students should be paying absolutely zero cost for theoretical education. And Practical education can be gained by working while getting paid. Even the best american talent would not be left behind from this debt. Americans used to attract people all over the world for its education . But this high tuition cost is only going to loose america’s best talent since this talent will be looking for cheaper university for education in the world. Only rich students who can afford high tuition cost will go to the good universities and not the good students and what values these universities will have then?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE