Charlie Langton: Size Doesn’t Matter…For Mitt

February 23, 2012 11:51 AM

Mitt Romney (Getty Images)

Filed under

Blogs, CBS Detroit Blogs, Charlie Langton Mornings

Have you heard the phrase “size doesn’t matter?” Well, I’m here to tell you it doesn’t! Of course I’m referring to the size of a win in the Michigan Republican primary… and nothing else. A win for Mitt in Michigan, by even one vote, is a win. Don’t buy into Democratic Party Chairman Mark Brewer’s rhetoric, echoed by Newt Gingrich (gee, the two of them agree on something), that Mitt should win big or it’s a loss. A win is a win is a win and any of these people need all of the wins they can get. Ron Paul would like a win.

Hype doesn’t reflect reality. What we’re hearing is only inflated rhetoric that makes a win by Romney hopefully look like a loss. This way, the losing candidates will have something to celebrate. The logic of all of this is twisted worse than Obamacare.

Bottom line, Mitt’s gotta win the mitt, even by a little bit!

Ashok

Strawman, do your friggin’ hooewmrk before you start spewing, mmmKay?”The GOP spends the money on things the “Libeals’ would not approve of. Pay raises for politicans, more red tape and expanded government departments not bringing any proven results and un-audited as well, perfect example faith based initiaves,over a billion last year dumped into a program that has not been proven to bring any results, nor is it monitored for results or spending. ” See for the history of congressional pay raises. You allege “over a billion” in faith-based initiatives. You make the allegation, you back it up. If you can. And try actual news sources instead of bradblog or rawstory this time, mmmKay?”"Liberals’ would try to spend on more important ideas, health care, actual education programs that work, unlike Bush’s “no child”, clearly not working as evidenced by the lowest SAT scores in the history of the test itself.”From the notoriously GOP-friendly website, the lowest male-female combined SAT scores happened for the verbal portion of the test in 1994, and in the math portion of the test in 1980. Lowest male verbal – 1994. Lowest female verbal – 1990-92. Lowest male math – 1980. Lowest female math – 1980. Yeesh. Strawman, do you even know the existence of ‘google’ and how it can be your friend in such endeavors?