ANN ARBOR (WWJ) – Although evidence suggests that requiring convicted sex offenders to register with the police reduces the chances they’ll re-offend, a recent paper co-authored by a University of Michigan law professor shows that publicizing sex offenders’ identities may actually increase the chances they’ll commit another sex crime.
So, is it time to revisit Michigan’s sex offender registry?
The paper examined 10 years of data from 15 states and took a systematic look at the aftermath of two stages of the ever-changing get-tough legislative response to sex offenders: first, laws that require convicted offenders to register with their local police, and second, laws that also require notification — that is, publication of offenders’ identities, their crimes, etc. — either through searchable internet pages or other means, including personal visits or newspaper notices.
The outcomes of the two approaches are distinctly different, the professors found.
First, their evidence indicates that a registration requirement without public notification reduces reported sex crimes substantially, probably because police are better able to monitor and arrest repeat offenders.
In jurisdictions with an average number of offenders registered, that reduction can be as high as 13 percent, and grows larger as the registries grow. This last fact implies that registration laws lower crime more by discouraging registered offenders from committing new crimes than by discouraging potential first offenders from committing crimes in the first place.
Second, the data suggest that programs like Michigan’s, where the identities of registered offenders is made public, sex offenders are more likely to commit new crimes.
Requiring notification could deter first offenders, but that may be more than offset by released offenders’ tendency to commit new crimes when they are subjected to notification requirements. The data also indicate that jurisdictions with notification laws suffer slightly higher rates of overall reported sex crimes.
While registration appears to discourage repeat offenses, notification requirements actually seem to encourage them — possibly, according to the authors, “because the associated psychological, social, or financial costs (of notification requirements) make a crime-free life relatively less desirable.”