LANSING (WWJ/AP) – Does the loss of a kidney deserve compensation?

The Michigan Supreme Court is hearing arguments Wednesday in a case involving a Plymouth woman who is suing her doctor over a five-year delay in learning that she had a cancerous kidney.

A test showed evidence of a cancerous lesion on one of Marie Huddleston’s kidney in 2003, but it was not reported to her. Another test in 2008 showed the lesion had grown, forcing the removal of one of Huddleston’s kidneys, leaving her with a good one.

Dr. Joyce Leon claims she can’t be sued because Huddleston still has a good kidney and hasn’t suffered an injury that can be compensated.

The state appeals court last year said Huddleston’s malpractice lawsuit can proceed, saying medical professionals shouldn’t get a pass on possible malpractice just because a patient has another good organ.

The Supreme Court will decide whether to take the case or take some other action on the doctor’s appeal.

TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Watch & Listen LIVE