CBS62logoNEW2013_blue_final_header_White wwj950-sm2011b 971-ticket-35smb 35h_CBSSportsRad_Detroit

Local

Michigan’s 2004 Gay Marriage Ban Faces Challenge

View Comments
Demonstrators are seen outside District Court in Detroit. (credit: Charlie Langton/WWJ)

Demonstrators are seen outside District Court in Detroit. (credit: Charlie Langton/WWJ)

Get Breaking News First

Receive News, Politics, and Entertainment Headlines Each Morning.
Sign Up

DETROIT (WWJ/AP) – Two Detroit-area nurses wanted to adopt each other’s children, not rewrite Michigan law on gay marriage. But their lawsuit could end up overturning a 2004 constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage that passed by a landslide.

U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman may throw out the law Wednesday after hearing arguments in his Detroit courtroom. It was his suggestion that Jayne Rowse and April DeBoer amend their lawsuit last year, an invitation that has gay rights supporters believing marriage may become a reality in Michigan.

“We’re optimistic that this is going [to] hopefully be the beginning of our journey.” DeBore told WWJ’s Pat Sweeting on Wednesday. “… We know it’s going to be a much longer journey than this, but, you know, if he overturns it today, it’s the start; and that’s all we can ask for right now.”

Even if Friedman kills the law, he could freeze his decision and allow the state of Michigan to appeal, which would stop a rush to county courthouses for a marriage license.

DeBoer said she and Rowse don’t plan to get married right away. They’ll wait to make sure Friedman’s decision is not overturned on appeal.

The couple was flanked by dozens of supporters outside the courthouse.

“I would be thrilled,” said the Rev. Bill Freeman of Harbor Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Muskegon, who is poised to handle same-sex weddings. “I opposed the ban. The country and the people of Michigan have done a 180 on the question of gay rights and same-sex marriage.”

Thirteen states and the District of Columbia allow same-sex marriage, but the issue can be found in courtrooms around the country. The New Jersey Supreme Court said it will soon decide whether gays can marry there, and a Utah federal judge in December will hear arguments about the state’s ban.

DeBoer and Rowse are raising three adopted children with special needs. They filed a lawsuit in 2012 hoping to strike down a state law that bars same-sex partners from adopting each other’s kids. The case was groundbreaking on its own, but then Friedman suggested challenging the gay marriage ban. If the ban is overturned, other laws, such as the adoption restriction, likely would fall, too.

Attorney Dana Nessel, co-counsel in the case, said she is hoping for a ruling that will be in favor of her clients.

“Michigan has one of the most draconian constitutional bans in the nation in that not only does it prevent same-sex marriage, but it also prohibits domestic partnerships or civil unions. So, there is literally no way in which same-sex couples can achieve any kind of legal recognition of their relationships in the state of Michigan,” Nessel told WWJ Newsradio 950.

A constitutional amendment declaring marriage as between a man and a woman was approved by 59 percent of Michigan voters in 2004.

Attorneys for DeBoer and Rowse say the amendment violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which bars states from treating people differently. They believe they’ll benefit from a June decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, which struck down part of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, saying married gay couples are entitled to the same federal benefits available to straight couples.

“Here and now, as a matter of constitutional law as well as of social policy, the time for … dehumanization is past,” the couple’s lawyers said in a court filing.

Michigan, meanwhile, is highlighting the Supreme Court’s recognition that states do have authority to regulate marriage.

“Defining marriage as between one man and one woman furthers Michigan’s legitimate interests in attempting to provide the optimal family setting for its children,” the attorney general’s office said in a court filing.

Gary Glenn, who leads the conservative American Family Association of Michigan, said it would be a mistake for a judge to extinguish a law on the books for nearly a decade.

“One Detroit lawyer in a black robe doesn’t have the legitimate constitutional or moral authority to overturn the will of millions of Michigan voters,” Glenn said.

In Ann Arbor, the Washtenaw County clerk’s office said judges and clergy will be available at the local courthouse if Friedman allows same-sex marriage. The county will waive the typical three-day waiting period to get a license, at least on Thursday.

“There’s obviously a lot of emotion, and a lot of people have been waiting a long time,” said Ed Golembiewski, chief deputy clerk.

Bishop Jerry Brohl of Blessed John XIII Community, a church for Christians of all stripes in Wyandotte, near Detroit, said he’s eager to bless same-sex marriages, even if he doesn’t know the couple.

“Under normal circumstances, I’d want to spend a bit more time with a couple,” he said. “But under these circumstances, I feel I need to make an exception. You have two mature persons who are committing themselves to a relationship based on love.”

TM and © Copyright 2013 CBS Radio Inc. and its relevant subsidiaries. CBS RADIO and EYE Logo TM and Copyright 2013 CBS Broadcasting Inc. Used under license. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

View Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,916 other followers